I was in the coffee shop a little while back studying Isaiah.
A guy walked in wearing black, sport-shades and a serious look. It started me thinking.
We admire the invincible. The tough. The survivors. We love
to feel strong. We long to feel fearless.
Think of the line of sunglasses that companies like
Oakley
have been built on. They give us a look of Robocop sternness.
Think of
Under Amour. Why has that company been so
successful? Why do we love the look and feel of chiseled impenetrability? We
become like what we admire (at least we try!).
Think of Ironman. A superhero because of a super-suit. What’s
the appeal? Do we want to be more robotic? Or is it the seeming invincibility
that comes from wearing and wielding the suit?
Here we are, wanting to be like, and looking more like, (powerful)
machines. Why?
I think this simultaneously
taps the inescapable image of God in us, and betrays the effects of the Fall.
It taps the made-to-live, eternity-in-our-hearts longing for
immortality. And it betrays the we-all-die-and-we-hate-it,
we-are-way-too-vulnerable-and-weak-and-we-hate-it reality we are desperately
trying to escape.
In our fallen blindness, we respond by trying to cover and
shield our vulnerability with robotic, synthetic, “armor-plating.” That will
keep out the threats. That will ensure our fragility is not exposed. We will
become more like machines. Yes. (Have you ever come away from talking to
someone so emotionally guarded that they seemed more machine than human; more
mechanical than relational?) Hard and impenetrable on the outside. It’s much
safer that way. Because, after all, we want to “live.”
But do we live? Or does this pursuit of synthetic safety
actually pose a greater risk? Listen to C.S. Lewis (from The Four Loves, emphasis added):
Of all arguments against love none makes so strong an
appeal to my nature as ‘Careful! This might lead you to suffering.’ … If I am
sure of anything I am sure that [Jesus’] teaching was never meant to confirm my
congenital preference for safe investments and limited liabilities. …
There is no safe investment. To love at all is to be
vulnerable. Love anything, and your heart will certainly be wrung and possibly
be broken. If you want to make sure of keeping it intact, you must give your
heart to no one, not even to an animal. Wrap it carefully round with hobbies
and little luxuries; avoid all entanglements; lock it up safe in the casket or
coffin of your selfishness.
But in that casket — safe, dark, motionless, airless — it
will change. It will not be broken; it will become unbreakable, impenetrable,
irredeemable. The alternative to tragedy, or at least to the risk of tragedy,
is damnation. The only place outside Heaven where you can be perfectly safe
from all the dangers and perturbations of love is Hell.
Think of how the gospel leads us in the polar opposite path.
The human path. The Christlike path. The risky, painful,
strength-through-weakness, die-that-others-might-live path.
God the Son – the truly invincible – willingly and lovingly
became violable, to break through the hard shell of our slavery to sin and make
us alive in Him, forevermore. He became a weak slave and a victim of unjust
trial and death, to free us from our slavish fear of death and powerless victimization
and weakness.
The eternal, immortal, invisible, transcendent, sovereign,
omnipotent God dropped into this space and time between the knees of a young
peasant girl in a smelly stable. He willingly took on weakness in order to make
us truly strong from the inside out. Strong enough to be honest about our
weakness. Strong enough to risk our comfort and security to be vulnerable with
others in the cause of love. Strong enough to risk the dangerous path to
becoming truly human. We are not robots. We were never intended to be.
But we were made to live. And live immortally. The Son of
God embraced human mortality in order that those who believe in him might not
perish, but have everlasting, immortal, unkillable, invincible life.
Romans 8:31-39
What then shall we say to these things? If God is
for us, who can be against us? He who did not spare his own Son but gave him up
for us all, how will he not also with him graciously give us all things? … Who
shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or distress, or
persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or danger, or sword? … No, in all these
things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us. For I am sure that
neither death nor life, nor angels nor rulers, nor things present nor things to
come, nor powers, nor height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will
be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord.